Coco Glucoside vs Decyl Glucoside: Foam and Feel Compared
A side by side look at two alkyl polyglucoside surfactants for natural-leaning cleansers, covering foam, mildness, INCI, and CAS.
Anyone formulating a natural-leaning cleanser eventually lands on these two, and then spends way too long trying to figure out which one actually fits the product they're building. They're cousins, both alkyl polyglucosides, both derived from plant-based fatty alcohols and sugar, both marketed as gentle. But they behave differently enough in a real formula that picking the wrong one shows up immediately in the feel of the finished product.
What they have in common
Both coco glucoside and decyl glucoside are non-ionic surfactants made by combining a fatty alcohol with glucose, which is why they read as "sugar-derived" on ingredient lists that lean into natural positioning. Both are considered mild compared to sulfates, both are commonly used as co-surfactants or primary cleansers in facial washes, baby products, and sensitive-skin lines, and both show up frequently in formulas trying to avoid SLS or SLES.
Where they actually differ
The difference comes down to the fatty alcohol chain length each one is built from.
Coco glucoside is derived from coconut fatty alcohols, which means a mixed chain length profile, generally landing in a mid-range that gives decent foam with a creamy, somewhat richer lather. It tends to feel a bit more conditioning on skin and hair, which is part of why you see it in shampoo bars and 2-in-1 formulas.
Decyl glucoside is derived specifically from a shorter, more uniform fatty alcohol chain. It produces a lighter, less dense foam, tends to feel cleaner and less residue-prone, and is often the go-to choice when a formulator wants mildness without much conditioning residue left behind, like in a facial cleanser meant to rinse completely clean.
| Coco Glucoside | Decyl Glucoside | |
|---|---|---|
| INCI name | Coco-Glucoside | Decyl Glucoside |
| CAS number | 68515-73-1 | 54549-25-6 |
| Fatty alcohol source | Coconut (mixed chain) | Shorter, more uniform chain |
| Foam character | Fuller, creamier lather | Lighter, cleaner rinse |
| Skin feel | Slightly more conditioning | Cleaner, less residue |
| Typical use | Shampoo bars, 2-in-1s, body wash | Facial cleansers, baby wash, micellar-style products |
Note that CAS numbers for glucoside surfactants can vary by supplier or specific chain composition, so always confirm against your supplier's documentation rather than assuming a single universal number applies across every source.
Formulating with either one
Neither is a great standalone primary surfactant if you need a lot of foam volume for a whipped-texture product. Both are frequently blended with a co-surfactant like cocamidopropyl betaine to build foam density while keeping the overall system mild. If you're chasing a natural claim and want to minimize the ingredient count, either can work as a primary cleanser at a moderate use level, but expect a softer foam experience than a sulfate-based system.
pH stability is decent for both, and they play reasonably well in a wide range of cleanser formats: liquid soap, shampoo, body wash, even some cream cleansers. Where they can behave differently is in salt thickening. Alkyl polyglucosides don't always respond to sodium chloride the way sulfates do, so if your thickening strategy depends on salt, test it directly with whichever glucoside you pick rather than assuming behavior carries over from a sulfate-based recipe.
Which one to reach for
If you want a shampoo bar or a body wash with a fuller, more luxurious-feeling foam and a bit of conditioning left behind, coco glucoside is usually the better fit. If you're building a facial cleanser, a baby wash, or anything where you want the skin to feel genuinely clean with minimal residue, decyl glucoside tends to be the stronger choice. Plenty of formulas actually use both together, layering the fuller foam of coco glucoside with the clean rinse of decyl glucoside.
Filing either one
Both are listed by their INCI names on a Cosmetic Notification Form, straightforward entries with no special restriction under the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist beyond standard surfactant handling. The part that trips people up is when a supplier sells a "coco glucoside complex" that's actually a blend with other surfactants or preservatives folded in. Check the technical data sheet for the full component breakdown before you assume the trade name maps to a single INCI ingredient.
If you're juggling several surfactant options across multiple SKUs, Cosmetic Comply matches your ingredient list to INCI names and CAS numbers automatically, including flagging when a "glucoside complex" is actually a multi-ingredient blend you need to break apart for an accurate filing.
Send your ingredients and we take it from here
A short intake form is all it takes to start. Every ingredient gets checked against your market's prohibited and restricted lists, then we file your notification and hand you a number you can track.
Start a filingKeep reading
Linalool: A Fragrance Allergen on the April 2026 List
Linalool sits in most floral fragrances and dozens of essential oils, and it becomes a mandatory Canadian label disclosure on April 12, 2026.
Decyl Glucoside: A Sugar-Based Surfactant for Gentle Cleansers
Decyl glucoside is a plant-derived, high-pH surfactant that needs a co-surfactant partner to actually clean well in a mild wash-off product.
Mica (CI 77019): Filing Sparkle Pigments and Their Coatings
Mica's INCI and CI number explained, and why coated pearlescent pigments must list mica plus a separate colorant like titanium dioxide.
Coconut Oil (Cocos Nucifera) INCI and CAS for Soap Makers
How to list coconut oil correctly on an INCI declaration, its CAS number, and how saponification changes what you write.