The Microbead Ban and What It Means for Body Scrubs
Why plastic microbeads got pulled from rinse-off scrubs and which natural exfoliants keep your formula on the right side of the rule.
Plastic microbeads used to be the default exfoliant in body scrubs and face washes because they're cheap, perfectly round, and gentle on skin compared to some natural grits. Then it became clear they were washing straight through wastewater treatment and into rivers and oceans by the billions, and regulators moved to prohibit them in rinse-off personal care products. If you're still formulating with polyethylene beads, or you inherited an old recipe that uses them, this is worth a hard look before your next batch.
What the ban actually targets
The prohibition is aimed specifically at tiny solid plastic particles, typically polyethylene, used as an exfoliant or cleansing agent in rinse-off products like facial scrubs, body washes, and toothpaste. The logic is about the product's fate after use: something you rinse down the drain in a body scrub ends up in the water system almost immediately, unlike a leave-on product.
This means the ban's reach maps closely to how the product is used, not just what's in it. A plastic-based texturizing agent in a leave-on lotion, where it isn't functioning as a rinse-off exfoliant, sits in a different category than the same material ground up and used as scrub grit in a wash-off product.
Why this snuck up on so many small makers
A lot of body scrub recipes that circulate among hobbyists and small-batch makers were written years ago, before the ban was a live compliance issue, and they still call for "poly beads" or a specific cosmetic-grade polyethylene exfoliant by trade name. If you bought a recipe or a supply kit that predates the shift, or you're using a supplier's blend without checking what's actually in it, you can end up prohibited without realizing it.
Check any exfoliant ingredient against its actual composition, not just its marketing name. "Micro-exfoliating beads" as a trade name tells you nothing about whether the underlying material is plastic or something else.
Natural exfoliants that keep a scrub compliant
The good news is exfoliation as a category isn't going anywhere, and there are plenty of options that were never plastic to begin with:
| Exfoliant | Typical INCI listing | Texture note |
|---|---|---|
| Sugar | Sucrose | Dissolves during use, softer edges |
| Salt | Sodium Chloride (or Maris Sal for sea salt) | Coarser, can be sharp on sensitive skin |
| Ground apricot or walnut shell | Prunus Armeniaca (Apricot) Seed Powder, Juglans Regia (Walnut) Shell Powder | Irregular particle shape, can be abrasive if over-milled |
| Jojoba beads | Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, esterified | Round and gentle like the old plastic beads, but biodegradable |
| Oatmeal | Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Flour | Very gentle, doubles as a soothing agent |
| Bamboo powder | Bambusa Arundinacea Stem Powder | Fine, consistent grit |
Jojoba beads in particular were developed largely as a plastic-bead substitute and behave similarly in a formula: round, consistent, and gentle enough for facial use. If your original recipe was built around a round bead texture, that's usually the closest swap.
Don't forget the claims side
Swapping the exfoliant is only half the job. If your scrub previously leaned on "micro-exfoliating" or "smooth beads" language tied to the old ingredient, update the marketing copy to match the new formula honestly. And as with any scrub or wash, stay inside cosmetic territory with your claims. A scrub that "cleanses and smooths" is a cosmetic claim; a scrub claiming to "treat acne" or "clear cystic breakouts" pushes toward drug territory regardless of what the exfoliant is made of.
Filing the reformulated version
If you already have an active Cosmetic Notification for the old formula, swapping the exfoliant is a formula change, which means it needs an amendment, not a fresh filing pretending the old one never existed. Update the ingredient list to the new INCI names, note the new concentration if it differs meaningfully from the old bead's use level, and file the amendment before you sell the new batch.
This is a good moment to double check the rest of the ingredient list too, since suppliers occasionally reformulate their own blends without much fanfare. Cosmetic Comply screens every ingredient in a formula, including expanding out supplier blends into their real components, against the current prohibited and restricted lists, so a leftover plastic bead or any other ingredient that quietly fell out of favor gets flagged before it becomes a problem rather than after.
Scrubs are a simple category on paper, sugar or salt in a base, but the microbead history is a decent reminder that "simple" formulas still need their ingredient list checked against current rules, not just the recipe you started with years ago.
Send your ingredients and we take it from here
A short intake form is all it takes to start. Every ingredient gets checked against your market's prohibited and restricted lists, then we file your notification and hand you a number you can track.
Start a filingKeep reading
Solid Perfume in a Balm Base: How the Notification Changes
A wax-based solid perfume and an alcohol eau de toilette are both fragrance, but they notify very differently on paper.
Stretch Mark Cream and the Cosmetic Versus Drug Line
How stretch mark cream wording decides whether you are filing a cosmetic notification or stepping into drug territory.
Why Diaper Rash Cream Is a Drug and Baby Lotion Is Not
How a barrier and rash-treatment diaper cream ends up classified as a drug while a plain baby lotion stays a cosmetic.
Why Fluoride Toothpaste Files as a Drug, Not a Cosmetic
Anticavity and antigingivitis claims put fluoride toothpaste in drug territory, and why that matters if you are branching into oral care.