Fragrance Allergen Labeling in the EU vs the Rest
How EU fragrance allergen disclosure compares to Canada's incoming List 1 and List 2 deadlines, and what that means if you sell in both.
If you formulate with essential oils and sell into more than one market, you've probably already noticed that "fragrance allergen labeling" doesn't mean the same list, the same threshold, or the same deadline everywhere. The EU has had allergen disclosure rules in place for years. Canada is in the middle of rolling in a comparable system right now, in two stages, and the dates matter if you're filing there.
The EU baseline
Under Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, certain fragrance allergens have to be individually listed by name in the ingredient list when they exceed set concentration thresholds, rather than being allowed to hide inside a generic "Parfum" or "Aroma" entry. The names you'll recognize on EU labels include Limonene, Linalool, Citronellol, Geraniol, Eugenol, and Coumarin, among others. These aren't synthetic additives dreamed up by a lab. They occur naturally in common essential oils, which is exactly why a lavender or citrus-heavy formula can trigger multiple allergen declarations even when every ingredient came from a "natural" source.
Canada's rollout, in two waves
Health Canada is bringing in its own fragrance allergen disclosure requirement on a staged timeline, and it's worth having both dates on your calendar if you sell there:
- April 12, 2026: List 1, the original fragrance allergen set, becomes mandatory on both the Cosmetic Notification Form and the product label
- August 1, 2026: List 2, an expanded set aligned with international lists, becomes mandatory on top of List 1
The disclosure triggers are concentration-based, not a flat "contains fragrance" flag. In leave-on products, disclosure kicks in above 0.001% (10 ppm). In rinse-off products, the threshold is higher, above 0.01% (100 ppm), which makes sense given that rinse-off contact time and residual exposure are lower.
Where the two systems rhyme and where they don't
The EU and Canadian approaches share the same underlying logic, list specific allergens by name once they cross a concentration threshold, rather than let "fragrance" or "parfum" cover for everything. The overlap in the named substances is real too. Limonene, Linalool, Citronellol, Geraniol, Eugenol, and Coumarin show up in both systems' allergen sets, since Canada's List 2 was built to align with international lists rather than invent a parallel taxonomy from scratch.
Where they diverge is mechanical:
| Aspect | EU (1223/2009) | Canada (CNF) |
|---|---|---|
| Where declared | Ingredient list on label | CNF filing and label, both |
| Rollout | Already in force | List 1: Apr 12 2026, List 2: Aug 1 2026 |
| Leave-on threshold | Set concentration threshold | Above 0.001% (10 ppm) |
| Rinse-off threshold | Set concentration threshold | Above 0.01% (100 ppm) |
| List scope | Established EU allergen list | List 1, then expanded List 2 |
What this means for your formula sheet
If you're selling the same essential-oil blend into both the EU and Canada, the smart move is to calculate every named allergen's finished-product concentration once and keep it on file, then check it against both markets' thresholds rather than treating each filing as a separate exercise. This matters even more for supplier fragrance blends. A blend's technical data sheet may quietly list Linalool at 8% of the blend itself. If you're using that blend at 1% of your total formula, the real concentration in your finished product is 0.08%, well above either threshold, and that math has to happen before you file, not after a regulator asks about it.
Essential oil blends are the usual surprise here. A "clean" ingredient deck full of botanicals can still carry six or more declarable allergens once you trace citrus, mint, and floral oils back to their allergen components.
Practical next step
If you already have an EU-compliant allergen declaration, don't assume it transfers automatically to a Canadian CNF filing. The named substances overlap heavily, but the format, the thresholds, and the timing are separate systems that both need to be satisfied on their own terms. Cosmetic Comply's Canadian filing flow is built to carry ingredient percentages through blends and flag allergen thresholds automatically as List 1 and List 2 come into force, which is one less spreadsheet to maintain by hand if you're juggling both markets at once.
Send your ingredients and we take it from here
A short intake form is all it takes to start. Every ingredient gets checked against your market's prohibited and restricted lists, then we file your notification and hand you a number you can track.
Start a filingKeep reading
Northern Ireland Cosmetic Rules Are Not the Same as Britain
Selling across the whole UK from one label? Northern Ireland still follows EU cosmetic rules while Great Britain runs its own separate system.
Korean Language Labeling Rules for Imported Cosmetics
Selling into Korea means a Korean-language label the importer applies, and its ingredient names do not map one-to-one with INCI.
Why Sunscreen Is a Drug in Some Markets and a Cosmetic in Others
How the US, EU, and Australia treat SPF products differently, and where sunscreen claims can knock your notification out of the cosmetic lane.
Labeling a Cosmetic in Multiple Languages Without Errors
Which label elements must be translated in Canada, the EU, and the Gulf, and why INCI ingredient names stay in a single fixed form everywhere.